unikum-nou

For Christmas I received an intriguing gift from a friend - my very own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and oke.zone my picture on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was completely written by AI, with a couple of basic triggers about me provided by my good friend Janet.

It's an interesting read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It my chatty style of composing, however it's also a bit repetitive, and very verbose. It may have exceeded Janet's triggers in collating information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a strange, repeated hallucination in the form of my cat (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI -book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually offered around 150,000 customised books, generally in the US, considering that pivoting from assembling AI -generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based on an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who created it, can order any additional copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody producing one in any person's name, consisting of celebrities - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book includes a printed disclaimer stating that it is fictional, developed by AI, and designed "exclusively to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is meant as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get sold even more.

He intends to broaden his variety, generating various categories such as sci-fi, yogicentral.science and possibly providing an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted form of customer AI - selling AI -generated items to human customers.

It's also a bit terrifying if, like me, you write for a living. Not least because it probably took less than a minute to create, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable content based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are discussing data here, we in fact suggest human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is pictures. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI -generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to nominate it for akropolistravel.com a Grammy award. And even though the artists were fake, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not think making use of generative AI for creative purposes ought to be banned, but I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without consent ought to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be very effective but let's develop it fairly and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually chosen to block AI designers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have actually decided to collaborate - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would allow AI developers to use creators' material on the web to assist establish their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He explains that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, orcz.com reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and ruining the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is likewise strongly versus getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and a great deal of happiness," states the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is undermining one of its finest carrying out markets on the vague guarantee of development."

A federal government representative said: "No move will be made until we are definitely confident we have a practical strategy that provides each of our goals: increased control for ideal holders to assist them license their content, access to top quality material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI strategy, a national information library containing public data from a wide range of sources will likewise be made offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to improve the safety of AI with, amongst other things, companies in the sector required to share information of the functions of their systems with the US federal government before they are released.

But this has actually now been rescinded by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is stated to want the AI sector to face less regulation.

This comes as a variety of lawsuits versus AI companies, and especially against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been taken out by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their permission, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of elements which can constitute reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it gathers training data and whether it must be paying for it.

If this wasn't all enough to contemplate, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It became one of the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its technology for a portion of the price of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's current dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I think that at the minute, wiki.rrtn.org if I really want a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weakness in generative AI tools for bigger projects. It has plenty of errors and hallucinations, and it can be rather tough to read in parts since it's so verbose.

But given how quickly the tech is evolving, I'm uncertain how long I can remain positive that my significantly slower human writing and modifying abilities, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest developments in international technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents all over the world.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.